<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effect of TRUNCATE TABLE command on LOG SHIPPING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sql-articles.com/blogs/effect-of-truncate-table-command-on-log-shipping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sql-articles.com/blogs/effect-of-truncate-table-command-on-log-shipping/</link>
	<description>One Stop for SQL Server related Queries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vidhya Sagar</title>
		<link>http://sql-articles.com/blogs/effect-of-truncate-table-command-on-log-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidhya Sagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sql-articles.com/blogs/?p=665#comment-49</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Paul Randal&lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-48" rel="nofollow">@Paul Randal</a><br />
Thanks Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Randal</title>
		<link>http://sql-articles.com/blogs/effect-of-truncate-table-command-on-log-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sql-articles.com/blogs/?p=665#comment-48</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a non-logged operation - everything it does is fully logged. Instead, you should describe it as a non-DML operation - in that the table rows are not deleted, but in fact the entire set of allocated pages are deallocated. In 2000 SP4 onwards, they&#039;re deallocated by unhooking the IAM chains and then deallocating the individual pages and extents using a background task - a process called deferred-drop, to avoid running out of locks during the deallocation process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a non-logged operation &#8211; everything it does is fully logged. Instead, you should describe it as a non-DML operation &#8211; in that the table rows are not deleted, but in fact the entire set of allocated pages are deallocated. In 2000 SP4 onwards, they&#8217;re deallocated by unhooking the IAM chains and then deallocating the individual pages and extents using a background task &#8211; a process called deferred-drop, to avoid running out of locks during the deallocation process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
